06 de janeiro de 2009
 
 
English Content
Articles
Interviews
PodCast
Contact us
Status
Principal
Início
Artigos
Revisões
Conspiração do Natal
Blog
Videos
Entrevistas em Audio
Links
Outros Portais
Fórum do café
Agenda
Confirmar Presença
Arquivos para downloads
Busca
Mapa do site
English Content
Renovatio Café
Renovatio em Video
Quem somos
Entre em Contato
Fórum sobre o site
Newsletters disponíveis
Seus dados
RSS for English Articles
RSS for English written articles
feed image
Itens relacionados
Doações

Enter Amount:

Emerging Church in the Brazilian Context PDF Imprimir E-mail
Avaliação do Usuário: / 0
PiorMelhor 
Por Gustavo K-fé Frederico   
27 de março de 2008
Índice de Artigos
Emerging Church in the Brazilian Context
Página 2
Página 3
Página 4
Página 5
Página 6
Página 7
Página 8
Página 9

 I suggest the use of the arts by the various communities as national expressions. Even though it is difficult to define what is really Brazilian, this should not be a problem. One way or another it is easy to intuitively identify Brazilian characteristics in the arts. In music I suggest the use of daily language, the use of typical Brazilian instruments, the use of typical Brazilian rhythms and melodic lines. Let us imagine more Brazilian poetry in our worship. Experiments in architecture would also be appropriate. Let us imagine folklore-centres-churches. And why not reconcile soccer with the theology and the liturgy? Why don’t we pray for both city teams before the matches? I also suggest a larger introduction of the afro elements into the liturgy; let us imagine changes to Communion (Eucharist). Let us think about aboriginal peoples expressions in liturgy. Let us engage in a better interaction with and deeper understanding of the aboriginal culture, instead of sending missionaries and saying “good-bye, pal, break a leg. Send us pictures of the undomesticated” (I refer to reverse mission trips below). Often the aboriginal communities are whole communities of beggars in the urban centres. (Note that I’m not advocating for the inclusion of afro and aboriginal elements in liturgy and social work with a liberal view of inclusion. Rather, as collaborators in the process of rescuing a Brazilian identity and allowing for missional communities to better incarnate the gospel.) Let us remember, finally, that the Brazilian contextualization must go beyond liturgy: the church must understand the longings of the Brazilian people and be capable of communicating “good news” in the same dimension and language. To lead as a body has direct implications to leadership. The idea of community is very strong among emerging churches. It was said that trinity is essentially a community. Church must, therefore, be communitarian. Leadership is another important theme in the emerging conversation. I would speculate that a certain number of pastors currently seek success, money and status using churches. This would be one more symptom that some ecclesiastical institutions exist more as an end to itself than to the mission of the Kingdom. Respect and will to serve the other propels emerging communities to exercise different kinds of leadership. I hope the emerging movement in Brazil will grow “bottom-up” instead of “top-down”. The pastor figure most of the times is not discharged, but rethought. Ideas of pastors as company CEOs are substituted. In modernism there is the production of concepts for believers-consumers. In postmodernism the promises of happiness and satisfaction portrayed by ads, spams and telemarketing are quickly filtered out. And so is the avalanche of Internet data. People in postmodernity are wary of preprocessed, shoveled truths. On the contrary, they prefer demonstrated truths, and desire the experiment them first hand. Manipulative leaders, therefore, have no place. Leadership based on power, control and submission to authority are characteristics of modern churches. The concentration and monopoly of knowledge are substituted by the idea of free access to distributed information, as in the Internet. People look for a journey together, and again, lived out concepts. No leader takes unilateral decisions, but everyone, one way or another, are invited to participate in the decisions.

Theological seminaries are called to rethink their formation of leaders. They could have more direct channels of communication with communities (Christian and “common ones”<!--[if !supportFootnotes]-->[22]<!--[endif]-->) to better understand how leaders can help communities. They could have more interchange programs with other faculties in the Human Sciences, such as Sociology. They could stimulate and support internships of youth in emerging communities. They could publish more articles on the Internet and have more blogs and podcasts fostering dialog. They could support and involve more “lay people”. They could review missiology applied to the Brazilian context. And they should require their students and professors to read more books about the emerging church.



Última Atualização ( 03 de novembro de 2008 )
 
< Anterior   Próximo >